← Swik
Comparison

Bartender alternative: radial access instead of a cluttered menu bar

This is a soft comparison. Bartender and Swik do not really compete — they solve different problems. Bartender hides menu bar icons so your menu bar looks clean. Swik replaces most of the reasons you click into the menu bar at all. If you think about why you wanted Bartender in the first place, the radial-menu version of the fix is worth considering.

Bartender is a good app. It does what it says, it does it well, and for a lot of people the $16 is justified purely for the visual calm of a tidy menu bar. This post is not arguing against it. It is arguing that there is often a cleaner version of the same outcome.

Why people buy Bartender

If you look at the menu bars of most developers, designers, and PMs, there are somewhere between twelve and twenty-five icons up there. A typical set:

That is a lot. Bartender's solution is to hide most of them behind a single icon, which you click to expand. The menu bar looks clean. You still click the same icons when you need them.

The question Bartender does not ask

Here is what I noticed when I actually audited my own menu bar clicks over a week: I click the same eight icons repeatedly. Timer. Clipboard. Mic toggle. Music. Zoom. VPN. Text expander. Focus toggle. The other fifteen exist for passive status — I look at them but rarely click them.

Bartender cleans up the look, but it does not reduce the number of clicks. You still reach up to the top of the screen to start your timer. You still open the clipboard manager by clicking its icon. The only thing that changed is the layout.

The cleaner fix is to stop reaching for the menu bar for the eight things you actually click. Most of them can be triggered by a keyboard shortcut, an AppleScript, or a Shortcut from Shortcuts.app. If they can be triggered by any of those, they can be wedged into a radial menu.

What this looks like in practice

Take the eight-thing list and map each to a wedge:

Menu bar clickRadial menu equivalent
Start Pomodoro timerShortcut: run timer app's "start" shortcut
Open clipboard managerGlobal hotkey that the wedge fires
Toggle mic muteShortcut: Toggle Mic (system)
Play / pause musicShortcut: Play/Pause on frontmost player
Join next Zoom meetingShortcut: Join Next Meeting
Toggle VPNShortcut: Toggle VPN
Text expander quick-insertWedge runs its hotkey
Toggle Focus modeShortcut: Toggle Do Not Disturb

Eight wedges. One gesture to open the menu. One flick to trigger any of them. The trip to the menu bar disappears entirely. You only look at the top of the screen when a status icon is telling you something passive.

At that point you have not cleaned up the menu bar. You have made the menu bar's cleanliness irrelevant to your workflow. The icons can stay exactly where they are — you are no longer clicking them.

Side by side

FactorBartenderSwik radial menu
What it doesHides menu bar iconsReplaces menu bar clicks
Still click into menu bar?Yes, through a collapseRarely
Affects visual clutterYes, directlyIndirectly — you stop noticing the bar
Affects travel distance of cursorNoYes (menu appears at cursor)
Works for apps with no hotkeyYesNo, unless the app has a Shortcut or AppleScript
Passive status glanceStill possibleNot applicable (menu is hidden)
Pricing$16 one-timeFree / $9 one-time Pro

The "cursor travel" argument

There is a genuine ergonomic cost to the menu bar that people underweight. Every click up there is a trip from wherever your cursor was to the top of the screen and back. On a 27-inch display that is hundreds of pixels each direction, several times an hour.

A radial menu appears at the cursor's current position. You never move the cursor to a specific screen coordinate. The flick happens wherever you happen to be. For someone who clicks the menu bar thirty times a day, that alone is worth the switch even before you count the "clean menu bar" side effect.

When Bartender is still the right call

Several cases where a radial menu will not substitute:

These are not edge cases. For a lot of people, passive status matters more than cursor travel.

When radial access wins

Consider Swik if:

You can also run both. Bartender for the three icons you still need to click, Swik for the eight you used to click. They do not conflict. The honest framing: Bartender is a fix for how the menu bar looks. Swik is a fix for how the menu bar works. Pick based on which one is actually bothering you.

Frequently asked questions

How can a radial menu replace Bartender?

Bartender hides menu bar icons to clean up visual clutter. A radial menu addresses the deeper problem: you don't need 20 menu bar icons if you can reach their actions via a gesture. Put your most-clicked menu bar actions on wedges and the menu bar becomes optional.

Does Bartender actually hide icons, or does it just shuffle them?

Bartender hides icons into a secondary menu that appears when you click its own icon. The icons still exist — Bartender is a chrome-management tool, not an action-management tool. If the icons are only there for their click behaviors, those behaviors can live on a radial menu and the icons don't need to exist at all.

What's different about the radial approach vs. hiding menu bar icons?

Bartender solves "too many icons in my menu bar." A radial menu solves "too many cursor trips to the top-right corner." The radial stays wherever the cursor is, which is a Fitts's Law win — the menu bar is the most distant target on any screen, and a radial menu never requires traveling to it.

Can I use Bartender and Swik together?

Yes, they solve different problems. Bartender cleans up visual clutter; Swik reduces cursor travel. If you want both, bind Swik to your most-used menu bar actions and let Bartender tidy the rest.

Swik — a radial menu for macOS

Launch anything. One gesture. Free for five wedges, $9 one-time for unlimited. Requires macOS 14 Sonoma or later.

Download for macOS